what do you think about clashrules?

[MPTI]

in the most clashes I have seen, there always has been a dispute here and there.
how do you feel about the clash regulations?

like: sound A plays a tune (not a dub), sound B plays the same tune later in the dubround but as a dub than offcourse(meaning same artist same tune same riddim)

or

sound A plays a dub sound B plays the same tune as a dub but on a different riddim

or

or sound A plays a tune and sound B plays the same tune but from another artist (like the original f.e.)

or

sound A plays a dub and sound B plays the same dub but it is a counteraction (like sound A plays Nononono from dawn penn and sound B plays Yesyesyes also from penn and on the same riddim)

or

same as above but sound B plays almost exactly the same dub but it is on "for the evening"

are these playbacks or not?

are there albums or 12" alowed in the 45-round?

are white labels alowed?

.........
I know how I believe everything should be judged, how do de beljam reggae dancehall boarders see it
or are there others clashregulations you want to discuss?

[King David]

sound A plays a tune (not a dub), sound B plays the same tune later in the dubround but as a dub than offcourse(meaning same artist same tune same riddim)

No playback but stupid to do so

sound A plays a dub sound B plays the same tune as a dub but on a different riddim

PLAYBACK

sound A plays a tune and sound B plays the same tune but from another artist (like the original f.e.)

For example one sound play Derrick Harriot Stop that train and next sound play the original Keith and Tex Stop that train no playback big counteraction

sound A plays a dub and sound B plays the same dub but it is a counteraction (like sound A plays Nononono from dawn penn and sound B plays Yesyesyes also from penn and on the same riddim)

Counteraction so no playback but voicing yes yes yes as counteration show lack of originality

same as above but sound B plays almost exactly the same dub but it is on "for the evening"

Special for the night so no playback

[skwizzard]

kingdavid said:

sound A plays a tune (not a dub), sound B plays the same tune later in the dubround but as a dub than offcourse(meaning same artist same tune same riddim)

No playback but stupid to do so



PLAYBACK



For example one sound play Derrick Harriot Stop that train and next sound play the original Keith and Tex Stop that train no playback big counteraction



Counteraction so no playback but voicing yes yes yes as counteration show lack of originality

same as above but sound B plays almost exactly the same dub but it is on "for the evening"

Special for the night so no playback

Volledig mee akkoord

[MPTI]

kingdavid said:

Counteraction so no playback but voicing yes yes yes as counteration show lack of originality

I also think the same way besides the one above, because it realy depends. because one counteraction is not the other because a dub is often unique when you give the artist another punchline than the original tune. you can do that with the thought in mind that one day you can use it as a counteraction.
but I think it is still a risk. when you counteract you must counteract hard. not just play the same tune with different punchline.

but for the rest I think exactly the same

and yes I can't logically say that playing a dub while the other sound has played the original in the 45 round is a playback but it will strongly effect my decision. (I heard it in the BAR vs Ivory clash with utan green)